Poll: 80% say women should be able to have sex for pleasure, not pregnancy

A model new poll on public attitudes in direction of contraception finds that Persons are pretty progressive about it.

After President Trump was elected no matter his famously misogynistic phrases and actions, many Individuals anxious that the nation was going backward on gender factors. And since Trump has promised to appoint Supreme Court docket docket judges who would overturn Roe v. Wade, reproductive effectively being significantly seems beneath assault.

Nevertheless according to a new poll carried out by PerryUndem, a nonpartisan public opinion evaluation company in Washington, DC, the American public nonetheless holds remarkably progressive views on gender and effectively being protection. (The poll was fielded March 2 by the use of 6 and surveyed a marketing consultant sample of 1,094 registered voters nationwide.)

Eighty % of voters think about lady should be succesful to have intercourse for pleasure with out worrying about being pregnant. That’s in regards to the equivalent proportion of voters, 76 %, who talked about males should be succesful to have intercourse for pleasure with out worrying about being pregnant.

Sturdy majorities of voters say that entry to cheap contraception is important for ladies’s rights, equality, and monetary stability.

And majorities moreover oppose a lot of the Republican Celebration’s biggest priorities on women’s effectively being — along with defunding Deliberate Parenthood, proscribing entry to abortion, and banning federal tax from paying for abortion.

Properly being and Human Corporations Secretary Tom Worth has refused to promise that he wouldn’t roll once more women’s effectively being constructive features similar to the no-cost birth control benefit.Nevertheless two-thirds of Individuals want to protect that revenue in place.

This degree is worth pausing on. One amongst America’s two essential political occasions is ideologically devoted to insurance coverage insurance policies on women’s effectively being that the majority Individuals don’t agree with the least bit.

And the impression of these insurance coverage insurance policies is perhaps to cut back entry to women’s effectively being care by making it each costlier or a lot much less extensively accessible.

Most voters say cheap contraception is important to women’s rights, and to the monetary system as a whole

Hormonal contraception has unquestionably had huge impacts on society as a result of it was first marketed in 1960. It allowed women to delay marriage and childbearing and enter the workforce in greater numbers. That meant women had additional alternatives about what to do with their lives, and it boosted the nation’s GDP throughout the course of.

Nevertheless the necessary factor phrase for the current debate on contraception is “affordable.”

Many Republicans and conservatives staunchly opposed the contraception revenue, which covers all 18 FDA-approved methods of contraception at no additional worth to women who’ve insurance coverage protection.

Some had moral objections to contraception, or balked on the idea that they should should ”pay for” a woman’s choice to have sex. Others anxious regarding the outcomes of such a authorities mandate on the private market. And others — along with Worth — rejected the idea that women really want the revenue the least bit.

Consistent with the model new poll, nonetheless, most Individuals see quite a lot of benefits to women’s functionality to entry cheap contraception — for ladies, for his or her households, and for the monetary system as a whole.


Black and Latino voters had been significantly additional attainable than non-Hispanic whites to make these connections: 71 % of Latino voters and 67 % of black voters, in distinction with 59 % of white voters, talked about that contraception impacts women’s alternate options to be financially safe. And whereas 65 % of voters normal and 61 % of white voters talked about contraception impacts “women’s rights and freedoms as individuals,” 79 % of Latino voters and 76 % of black voters talked about the equivalent.

Nonetheless, solely 37 % of males talked about that they’d personally benefited from a confederate’s entry to cheap contraception.

One in three women say they’re going to’t afford to pay better than $10 a month for contraception

That’s the reverse motive “affordable” is the necessary factor phrase within the contraception debate: Theoretical “access” to contraception doesn’t suggest quite a bit if women can’t really afford it.

One-third of girls of reproductive age suggested pollsters that within the occasion that they or a cherished one wished contraception instantly, they may pay no more than $10 for it out of pocket. Fourteen % talked about they couldn’t afford to pay one thing the least bit.


It’s a comparable finish end result to a 2010 survey carried out by Deliberate Parenthood, which found third of girls struggled to afford their copays for contraception. These copays ranged from $15 to $50.

Which means that far more women would have problem affording an IUD or implant, which can worth as a lot as $1,00zero upfront. Nevertheless these longer-term methods are the best at stopping being pregnant — and drastically reduce teen pregnancy rates as soon as they’re made cheap.

Worth, then a marketing consultant, said in 2012 that “not one” lady really had problem affording contraception. The proof suggests he’s very improper about this — however he’s most of the people official with the most power over what happens to the contraception mandate ultimately.

Large majorities of voters oppose insurance coverage insurance policies that prohibit entry to women’s effectively being care or make it costlier


One amongst America’s two essential political occasions is ideologically devoted to insurance coverage insurance policies like defunding Deliberate Parenthood, banning abortion completely, slashing Medicaid benefits, and repealing a effectively being care regulation that has significantly expanded effectively being benefits for ladies.

Most voters don’t agree with any of these priorities.

Three-quarters of Individuals oppose defunding Deliberate Parenthood. Two-thirds want to protect the Fairly priced Care Act’s contraception revenue in place. Correctly over 80 % want to protect the ACA’s Medicaid development, no-cost women’s preventive care, and the ban on charging women additional for insurance coverage protection.

What’s additional, voters seem to affiliate these protection priorities with gender discrimination. When requested a hypothetical question about what would happen if males had been the intercourse which may get pregnant in its place of girls, 75 % of voters talked about they thought males throughout the new administration and in Congress would want to protect the contraception revenue in its place of take away it.

Even the supposedly controversial problem of “taxpayer-funded abortions,” which Republicans have used to justify defunding Deliberate Parenthood, isn’t really that controversial. A majority of voters (55 %) oppose banning Medicaid from masking abortions the least bit — even supposing Medicaid has been banned from masking most abortions for 40 years due to the Hyde Modification.

These findings from the PerryUndem poll monitor pretty fastidiously with a modern Kaiser Family Foundation poll on public attitudes in direction of women’s effectively being care and Deliberate Parenthood.

It seems clear that the American public has reasonably extra progressive views on women’s effectively being factors than does the Republican Celebration — or at least the insurance coverage insurance policies that the event has chosen to make a priority these days.