He’s peddling blatantly misleading claims about Russia’s involvement throughout the election.
The White House tweeted Monday that the directors of the FBI and the Nationwide Security Firm instructed Congress Russia did not have an effect on the 2016 presidential election. Nevertheless to borrow a phrase from the administration’s private parlance, that’s actually faux info.
The tweet, which acquired right here from the president&#zero39;s official authorities Twitter account and was despatched out by his workers, tries to bolster the declare with a clip from Monday’s high-profile congressional listening to with FBI Director James Comey and NSA Director Adm. Michael Rogers.
The NSA and FBI inform Congress that Russia did not have an effect on electoral course of. pic.twitter.com/d9HqkxYBt5
— President Trump (@POTUS) March 20, 2017
Must you’re sometimes predisposed to supply the Kremlin a transfer, the change superficially appears to once more Trump’s repeated insistence that Russian interference throughout the election had no affect on the results of the race.
Nevertheless Comey and Rogers had been actually answering a very explicit question — whether or not or not or not Russian hackers modified exact vote tallies throughout the important battleground states that decided the election. They’d been clearly not saying what Trump claims they’d been.
“Do you have any evidence that Russian cyber actors changed vote tallies in the state of Michigan?” House Eternal Select Committee on Intelligence Chair Devin Nunes requested Rogers.
“No, I do not, but I would highlight we are a foreign intelligence organization, not a domestic intelligence organization, so it would be fair to say we are probably not the best organization to provide a more complete answer,” Rogers replied.
“How about the state of Pennsylvania?”
Nunes proceeded to ask the equivalent question regarding Wisconsin, Florida, North Carolina, and Ohio, to which Rogers provided the equivalent precise response.
Then Nunes turned to Comey and requested the equivalent question.
“Comey, do you have any evidence at the FBI that any votes were changed in the states that I mentioned to Adm. Rogers?” Nunes requested.
“No,” Comey talked about.
Reverse to Trump’s tweet, Comey and Rogers are normally not denying that Russia interfered with the election. They’re in its place saying they don’t have any proof that hackers actually modified the vote counts by manipulating the machines doing the tallying or someway casting fraudulent ballots.
The Trump tweet simply is not solely making a false declare regarding the matter being talked about throughout the clip; it’s moreover at odds with an already established actuality: There’s a consensus throughout the intelligence group that Russia interfered with the election to help Trump win the White House.
In January, the Office of the Director of Nationwide Intelligence launched a declassified version of its report on Russia’s interference throughout the US presidential election, and revealed that the FBI, CIA, and NSA concluded with “high confidence” that Russian President Vladimir Putin deliberately sought to tip the election in favor of Trump.
The president’s official Twitter account moreover had completely different tweets regarding the listening to that had been merely as bizarre. Linking to a clip of an change between Rep. Trey Gowdy and Comey, the account tweets that “Comey refuses to deny he briefed President Obama on calls made by Michael Flynn to Russia.”
FBI Director Comey refuses to deny he briefed President Obama on calls made by Michael Flynn to Russia. pic.twitter.com/cUZ5KgBSYP
— President Trump (@POTUS) March 20, 2017
It’s true that Comey declined to answer the question by saying that he couldn’t get into any conversations he had with Obama sooner than Trump took office. Nevertheless it’s unclear what the Trump administration is attempting to get at with the tweet. It’s moreover not obvious what kind of political elements are scored by suggesting sitting president was briefed on a dependable nationwide security concern whereas nonetheless throughout the White House. What is clear is that Trump is using a public platform to aim to undermine his private FBI director by exploiting thought-about one in every of scores of “no comment” responses Comey gave to questions from lawmakers.
One might depend on that Trump’s official authorities Twitter account, primarily handled by his workers, would current a bit further restraint than the one which the president himself makes use of. One may very well be improper.